<noscript id="siaia"></noscript>
<optgroup id="siaia"></optgroup>
<optgroup id="siaia"><div id="siaia"></div></optgroup><center id="siaia"></center>
<optgroup id="siaia"><xmp id="siaia">
<optgroup id="siaia"><small id="siaia"></small></optgroup>
<optgroup id="siaia"><wbr id="siaia"></wbr></optgroup>
<center id="siaia"></center>
<center id="siaia"><div id="siaia"></div></center>
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.
Human eye

Colour vision

The spectrum, obtained by refracting light through a prism, shows a number of characteristic regions of colour—red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet. These regions represent large numbers of individual wavelengths; thus, the red extends roughly from 7600 angstrom units to 6500, the yellow from 6300 to 5600, green from 5400 to 5000, blue from 5000 to 4200, and violet from 4200 to 4000. Thus, the limits of the visual spectrum are commonly given as 7600 to 4000 angstroms. In fact, however, the retina is sensitive to ultraviolet light to 3500 angstroms, the failure of the short wavelengths to stimulate vision being due to absorption by the ocular media. Again, if the infrared radiation is strong enough, wavelengths as long as 10,000–10,500 angstroms evoke a sensation of light.

Within the bands of the spectrum, subtle distinctions in hue may be appreciated. The power of the eye to discriminate light on the basis of its wavelength can be measured by projecting onto the two halves of a screen lights of different wavelengths. When the difference is very small—e.g., five angstroms—no difference can be appreciated. As the difference is increased, a point is reached when the two halves of the screen appear differently coloured. The hue discrimination (hue is the quality of colour that is determined by wavelength) measured in this way varies with the region of the spectrum examined; thus, in the blue-green and yellow it is as low as 10 angstroms, but in the deep red and violet it may be 100 angstroms or more. Thus, the eye can discriminate several hundreds of different spectral bands, but the capacity is limited. If it is appreciated that there are a large number of nonspectral colours that may be made up by mixing the spectral wavelengths, and by diluting these with white light, the number of different colours that may be distinguished is high indeed.

Spectral sensitivity curve

At extremely low intensities of stimuli, when only rods are stimulated, the retina shows a variable sensitivity to light according to its wavelength, being most sensitive at about 5000 angstroms, the absorption maximum of the rod visual pigment, rhodopsin. In the light-adapted retina, one may plot a similar type of curve, obtained by measuring the relative amounts of light energy of different wavelengths required to produce the same sensation of brightness. Now the different stimuli appear coloured, but the subject is asked to ignore the colours and match them on the basis of their luminosity (brightness). This is carried out with a special instrument called the flicker-photometer. There is a characteristic shift in the maximum sensitivity from 5000 angstroms for scotopic (night) vision to 5550 angstroms for photopic (day) vision, the so-called Purkinje shift. It has been suggested that the cones have a pigment that shows a maximum of absorption at 5550 angstroms, but the phenomena of colour vision demand that there be three types of cones, with three separate pigments having maximum absorption in the red, green, and blue, so that it is more probable that the photopic luminosity curve is a reflection of the summated behaviour of the three types of cones rather than of one.

The Purkinje shift has an interesting psychophysical correlate. It may be observed, as evening draws on, that the luminosities of different colours of flowers in a garden change: the reds become much darker or black, while the blues become much brighter. What is happening is that, in this range of luminosities, called mesopic, both rods and cones are responding, and, as the rod responses become more pronounced—i.e., as darkness increases—the rod luminosity scale prevails over that of the cones.

It may be assumed that the sensation of luminosity under any given condition is determined by certain ganglion cells that make connections to all three types of cones and also to rods; at extremely low levels of illumination, their responses are determined by the activity aroused in the rods. As the luminance is increased, the ganglion cell is activated by both rods and cones, and so its luminosity curve is governed by both rod and cone activity. Finally, at extremely high luminances, when the rods are “saturated” and ceasing to respond, the luminosity curve is, in effect, compounded of the responses of all three types of cones.

Colour mixing

The fundamental principle of colour mixing was discovered by Isaac Newton when he found that white light separates spatially into its different component colours on passing through a prism. When the same light is passed through another prism, so that the individual bands of the spectrum are superimposed on each other, the sensation becomes one of white light. Thus, the retina, when white light falls on it, is really being exposed to all the wavelengths that make up the spectrum. Because these wavelengths fall simultaneously on the same photoreceptors, the evoked sensation is one of white. If the wavelengths are spread out spatially, they evoke separate sensations, such as red or yellow, according to which photoreceptors receive which bands of wavelengths. In fact, the sensation of white may be evoked by employing much fewer wavelengths than those in the spectrum, namely by mixing three primary hues—red, green, and blue.

Furthermore, any colour, be it a spectral hue or not, may be matched by a mixture of these three primaries, red, green, and blue, if their relative intensities are varied. Many of the colours of the spectrum can be matched by mixtures of only two of the primary colours, red and green; thus, the sensations of red, orange, yellow, and green may be obtained by adding more and more green light to a red one.

To one accustomed to mixing pigments, and to mixing a blue pigment, for example, with yellow to obtain green, the statement that red plus green can give yellow or orange, or that blue plus yellow can give white, may sound strange. The mixing of pigments is essentially a subtractive process, however, as opposed to the additive process of throwing differently coloured lights on a white screen. Thus, a blue pigment is blue because it reflects mainly blue (and some green) light and absorbs red and yellow; and a yellow pigment reflects mainly yellow and some green and absorbs blue and red. When blue and yellow pigments are mixed and white light falls on the mixture, all bands of colour are absorbed except for the green colour band.

Colour defectiveness

Subjects with colour-defective vision are those whose wavelength discrimination apparatus is not as good as that of the majority of people. They see many colours as identical that people with normal vision see as different. About 1 percent of males and a much smaller percentage of females are dichromats; that is, they can mix all the colours of the spectrum, as they see them, with only two primaries instead of three. Thus, protanopes (people with red blindness) require only blue and green to make colour matches. Whereas for people with normal (trichromatic) vision the various reds, oranges, yellows, and many greens are the result of mixing red and green, protanopes match all these with a green. In other words, protanopes are unable to distinguish all these hues from one another on the basis of their colour. If a protanope distinguishes them, it is because of differences in their luminosity (brightness). The protanope matches white with a mixture of blue and green and is, in fact, unable to distinguish between white and bluish green. Deuteranopes (people with green blindness) match all colours with a mixture of red and blue. Thus, the deuteranope’s white is a mixture of red and blue that appears purple to a person with normal vision. The deuteranope also is unable to discriminate reds, oranges, yellows, and many greens. Consequently, both types of dichromats are classed as red-green blind. For the protanope, however, the spectrum is more limited, because the individual is unable to appreciate red. Tritanopes (people with blue blindness) are rare, constituting only 1 in 13,000 to 65,000 of the population. Because tritanopes are blue blind, their colour discrimination is best in the region of red to green, where that of protanopes and deuteranopes is worse.

Responses of uniform population of photoreceptors

The scotopic (night) visual system, mediated by rods, is unable to discriminate between different wavelengths. Thus, a threshold stimulus of light with a wavelength of 4800 angstroms gives a sensation of light that is indistinguishable from that evoked by a wavelength of 5300 angstroms. If the intensities are increased, however, the lights evoke sensations of blue and green, respectively. Unlike cones, rods are unable to mediate wavelength, or colour, discrimination, because the rods form a homogeneous population, all containing the same photopigment, rhodopsin. Thus, the response of a neuron connected with a rod or a group of rods will vary with the wavelength of light. When the response, measured in frequency of discharge in the bipolar or ganglion cell, is plotted against the wavelength of the stimulating light, the curve is essentially similar to the absorption spectrum of rhodopsin when the same amount of energy is in each stimulus. Thus, blue-green of 5000 angstroms has the most powerful effect, because it is absorbed most efficiently, while violet and red have the smallest effects. In this sense, the rods behave as wavelength discriminators, but it is to be noted that there are pairs of wavelengths on each side of the peak to which the same response is obtained; thus, a blue of 4800 angstroms and a yellow of 6000 angstroms give the same discharge. Moreover, if the intensity of the stimulus is varied, a new curve is obtained, and now the same response is obtained with a high intensity of violet at 4000 angstroms as with blue at the lower intensity. In general, it is easy to show that, by varying the intensity of the stimulus of a single wavelength, all types of response may be obtained, so that the brain would never receive a message indicating, in a unique fashion, that the retina was stimulated with, say, green light of 5300 angstroms; the same message could be given by blue light of 4800 angstroms, red light of 6500 angstroms, and so on.

Ideally, colour discrimination would require a large number of photoreceptors specifically sensitive to small bands of the spectrum, but the number would have to be extremely large because the capacity for hue discrimination is extremely great, as has been indicated. In fact, however, the phenomena of colour mixing suggest that the number of photoreceptors may be limited.

Young-Helmholtz theory

It was the phenomena of colour mixing that led Thomas Young in 1802 to postulate that there are three photoreceptors, each one especially sensitive to one part of the spectrum; these photoreceptors were thought to convey messages to the brain, and, depending on how strongly they were stimulated by the coloured light, the combined message would be interpreted as that due to the actual colour. The theory was developed by Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz, and is called the Young-Helmholtz trichromatic theory. As expressed in modern terms, it is postulated that there are three types of cone in the retina, characterized by the presence of one of three different pigments, one absorbing preferentially in the red part of the spectrum, another in the green, and another in the blue. A coloured stimulus—e.g., a yellow light—would stimulate the red and green photoreceptors, but would have little effect on the blue; the combined sensation would be that of yellow, which would be matched by stimulating the eye with red and green lights in correct proportions of relative intensity. A given coloured stimulus would, in general, evoke responses in all three photoreceptors, and it would be the pattern of these responses—e.g., blue strongly, green less strongly, and red weakest—that would determine the quality of the sensation. The intensity of the sensation would be determined by the average frequencies of discharge in the photoreceptors. Thus, increasing the intensity of the stimulus would clearly change the responses in all the photoreceptors, but if they maintained the same pattern, the sensation of hue might remain unaltered and only that of intensity would change; the observer would say that the light was brighter but still bluish green. Thus, with several photoreceptors, the possibility is reduced of confusion between stimuli of different intensity but the same wavelength composition; the system is not perfect because the laws of colour mixing show that the eye is incapable of certain types of discrimination, as, for example, between yellow and a mixture of red and green, but as a means of discriminating subtle changes in the environment the eye is a very satisfactory instrument.

The direct proof that the eye does contain three types of cone has been secured, but only relatively recently. This was done by examining the light emerging from the eye after reflection off the retina; in the dark-adapted eye the light emerging was deficient in blue light because this had been preferentially absorbed by the rhodopsin. In the light-adapted eye, when only cone pigments are absorbing light, the emerging light can be shown to be deficient in red and green light because of the absorption by pigments called erythrolabe and chlorolabe. Again, the light passing through individual cones of the excised human retina can be examined by a microscope device, and it was shown by such examination that cones were of three different kinds according to their preference for red, green, and blue lights.

Get kids back-to-school ready with Expedition: Learn!
Subscribe Today!